Brady Transfer & Storage Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
COLLET, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Brady Transfer & Storage Company, which will hereinafter be referred to as Brady, carries on extensive operations as a common carrier by motor vehicle under certificates issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission. Brady was so engaged prior to the effective date of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, now Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 301-327. In due time after the effective date of the above Act, Brady applied to the Commission under the so-called Grandfather Clause, 49 U.S.C.A. § 306(a), for authority to continue the operations then…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. MaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Crescent Express Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3Cited by15 opinions
- Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc. And Henry F. Price v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Shein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- Consolidated Flower Shipments, Inc.—bay Area v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- International Transport, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.