Legal Opinion
In re: Encinias
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 2016No. 16-8038PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PER CURIAM..Jason Thomas Encinias, through counsel, 1 seeks authorization to file a second or successive motion for relief under 28 Ú.S.C. § 2255 to..challenge his enhanced sentence imposed under the career-offender : provision of the United States Sentencing-Guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. He relies on 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2), which permits authorization of claims that contain “a new rule - of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.” To obtain authorization, he must make a “prima facie” showing that his claim…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Case v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. MadridCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re: Creadell Hubbard v.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Thomas Hoffner, Jr. v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Raphael Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Derrick Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.