Legal Opinion

Thomas Hoffner, Jr. v.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 7, 2017No. 15-2883PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RESTREPO, Circuit Judge.

In Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), the Supreme Court held that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) is unconstitutionally vague. An identical residual clause existed until recently in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ career offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2). Petitioner Thomas Hoffner was sentenced as a career offender based on this residual clause in 2002. He seeks our authorization to challenge his sentence via a successive habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2).

Th…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Roy GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Kareem Sampson v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. In re MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API