Legal Opinion

State v. Daugherty

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1996No. 0924-94PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Following the lead of this Court’s plurality opinion in Garcia v. State, 829 S.W.2d 796 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), the Second Court of Appeals in this cause declined to recognize an inevitable discovery exception to the statutory exclusionary rule embodied in Article 38.23, V.A.C.C.P.1 Daugherty v. State, 876 S.W.2d 522 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1994). In Garcia the plurality had reasoned that “because the federal inevitable discovery doctrine is not an exception to core prohibitions of the Fourth Amendment, but only an exception to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Roquemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Peavy v. WFAA-TV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Hatch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API