Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spillman v. Security State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1928No. 25458PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This action arises out of the failure of the Security State Bank of Eddyville, Nebraska, hereinafter referred to as the bank. The doors of the bank were closed on the 17th day of September, 1923, and a receiver appointed on the 21st of the same month. T. F. O’Meara, a stockholder of the bank, filed a claim consisting of three items: (1) A certificate of deposit for $4,000; (2) a certificate of deposit for $500; (3) a deposit on open account of $502.65; and prayed that they be allowed as preferred and payable from the depositors’ guaranty fund.

The receiver filed objections to the claims, on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Spillman v. Atlas BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Spillman v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bliss v. BryanNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Spillman v. Nebraska State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hall v. Citizens State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Luikart v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Luikart v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API