Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Spillman v. Nebraska State Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1929No. 26863PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Redick, District Judge.
Appeal ¡by the receiver and cross-appeal by Security State Bank of Lawrence from an allowance of a claim in favor of the J. H. Yost Lumber Company against the depositors’ guaranty fund in the receivership proceedings of Nebraska State Bank of Harvard. The claim was scheduled by the receiver as one not payable out of the fund, *662whereupon claimant filed his petition in the district court. Answers were filed by the receiver and the Security State Bank of Lawrence, intervener. The issues will appear from the discussion in the opinion. By the judgment of the district court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Lankford v. Platte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Schallenberger v. First State Bank of HolsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bliss v. BryanNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. Security State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Hall v. Citizens State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932