Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 22, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2007-0470Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DENISE M. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 07-0470 (JDB) FEDER, SEMO & BARD, P.C., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Denise Clark brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq., against the law firm Feder, Semo & Bard ("Feder Semo"), the Feder Semo Retirement Plan and Trust ("Retirement Plan" or "Plan"), and two former trustees of the Retirement Plan, Joseph Semo and Howard Bard. Contending that defendants improperly denied her the full value of her…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API