Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Garrett

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1935No. 31776PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellee filed a declaration against appellant in which he charged that appellant was and is engaged in this state in the business of health and accident insurance; that appellee had for a long time carried a health and accident policy with appellant company; that appellee had been sick and was confined to his bed because of that sickness for approximately three months; that, having approached a recovery, he filed his claim for the compensation due him under said health policy; that a few days after the forwarding of said- claim the appellant company sent one of. its authorized agents to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Engle v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Watson v. DiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Graham Paper Co. v. WohlwendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Johnson v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. David R. Green v. Amerada Hess Corporation and L.A. StricklinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Universal Life Ins. Co. v. VeasleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Speed v. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. First National Bank v. LangleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API