Legal Opinion

Costanzo v. Tillinghast

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 25, 1932No. 2643PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court for Massachusetts denying a writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the petition. The petitioner, Alberto Costanzo, is now about thirty years of age, a native of Italy. He has resided in this country since 1905. He has two American-born children. His wife has recently divorced him. Neither the petitioner, nor his father, long since dead, became naturalized citizens. He was convicted in 1916 or 1917 of stealing an automobile and served six months in the county jail at Providence, R. I. He was again arrested September 29,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Zakonaite v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Skeffington v. KatzeffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  4. Weedin v. Tayokichi YamadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  5. Hughes v. TropelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stokes v. United States, Immigration & Nat. Serv.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. Soewapadji v. WixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Raftery ex rel. Giacomazzi v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API