Legal Opinion

State v. Copes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 26, 2010No. 99,403PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

On review of a Court of Appeals’ decision, we consider two issues of first impression for this court. Both arise from the district court’s failure to consider a defendant’s financial resources when imposing attorney fees and a fine.

First, can a defendant waive a K.S.A. 22-4513(b) requirement that a district court take into consideration “the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of such sum will impose” in setting attorney fees in Board of Indigents’ Defense Services (BIDS) cases and, if so, can that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. Ortega-CadelanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. State v. ShopteeseSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Mohr v. State Bank of StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. TafoyaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. McDanielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. State v. HornSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. UristaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API