Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v. Lumley Drywall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1991No. A91A1000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

We granted this first-impression discretionary appeal to determine whether the trial court erred in affirming the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board (“the board”) that a sole proprietor who elects workers’ compensation coverage as an “employee” under OCGA § 34-9-2.2 is an “employer” for purposes of reimbursement from the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund (“the Fund”), which was established by OCGA § 34-9-350 “to encourage the employment of the handicapped by protecting employers from excess liability for compensation when an injury to a handicapped worker…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Canton Textile Mills, Inc. v. LathemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Slaten v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Davis v. Bibb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. American Casualty Co. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. AAA BONDING COMPANY v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Homebuilders Association of Georgia v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Kaplan v. Pulte Home Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. EscuadraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Reynolds v. McKenzie-Perry Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Cartersville Ready Mix Co. v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API