Legal Opinion

Slaten v. Travelers Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1943No. 14648PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The purpose of the workmen’s compensation act (Code, title 114) was to substitute a method of accident insurance in the place of the common-law rights and liabilities for substantially all employees. It is a humanitarian measure enacted to avoid the evils which actions for torts had entailed. Under the old law the injured employee could recover from the employer damages only by proving that the employer was at fault; and the procedure for obtaining this relief was attended with protracted litigation, thus preventing the employee and his dependents from receiving financial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matter of Post v. . Burger GohlkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. State Revenue CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Pierce v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Barnes v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Samuel v. BaitcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Hart v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Smith v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Southeastern Aluminum Recycling, Inc. v. RayburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API