Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2009No. 2007-2389PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether Thompson’s prior convictions can be used to enhance the indictment against him. We conclude that they can.

Background

{¶ 2} Appellee, Billy Thompson II, was charged with two counts of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a) and (b). Because Thompson had been convicted of driving under the influence (“DUI”) three times within the previous six years, the indictments that were issued in this case charged felonies of the fourth degree, not misdemeanors. R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d) (“an offender, who, within six years of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. BrookeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. BrandonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. Thompson, 2007-Ca-00006 (11-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. FluhartOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API