Legal Opinion

Jones v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1985No. B004876PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Cinderella Jones instituted this action to recover damages for a cancerous condition she allegedly suffered as a result of ingestion of “Ortho-Novum SQ,” a contraceptive pill developed and manufactured by defendant Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (Ortho). At the close of plaintiff’s case-in-chief, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for nonsuit on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to establish a reasonable causal connection between the development or aggravation of the disease and the use of the suspect drug. On this appeal, plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parker v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. O'Keefe v. South End Rowing ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Charlotte KENNEDY and Robert Kennedy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLLAGEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API