Legal Opinion
Alpine County, California v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 8, 2005No. 2004-5071PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Alpine County, Amador County and El Dorado County (collectively “the Counties”) appeal the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims, granting the United States’ motion to dismiss their claims. Alpine County v. United States, 59 Fed.Cl. 610 (2004). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
In accordance with 16 U.S.C. § 500, twenty-five percent of the payments received by the United States for timber sold from a national forest must be paid to the states for the benefit of the public schools and roads in the counties where the national forest is situated:
16 U.S.C. § 500.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. Navajo NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Presley v. Commercial Moving & Rigging, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bradley v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Nelson Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.