Legal Opinion

Weakley v. Conradt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants.

Demurrer to the complaint, for want of sufficient facts, overruled,- and exception. Final judgment for the plaintiff.

The facts alleged in the complaint are briefly as follows: Thomas Weakley died intestate, owning certain lands in Miami County. He left a widow, Phebe A. Weakley, and two children, viz., Edward T. Weakley and Kate A. Taylor, nee Kate A. Weakley. The widow and children, together with William Taylor, the- husband of Kate A., were defendants in the action. After the death of Thomas Weakley, it being then supposed that there…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seller v. LingermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Muir v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
  3. Cartright v. BriggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Dunn v. FrazierIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Preston v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Helvey v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Coan v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Fiscus v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Porter v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Weaver v. GuyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API