Legal Opinion

People v. Wallin

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1981No. Crim. 39265PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of possessing marijuana for sale, possessing amphetamines and possessing barbiturates. He appeals from the judgment of conviction. We affirm.

Defendant’s principal contention on appeal is that his trial counsel was incompetent in that he failed to make a timely suppression motion pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5.

The evidence against defendant was all seized pursuant to a search warrant at defendant’s residence. Apparently one of the bases for the search warrant was information provided by one David Monroe. Prior to trial, at defendant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. McDanielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. LowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. ZikorusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. People v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. AubreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. (HC) Luebbers v. ArnoldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. P. v. Cabrera CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API