Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 15, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of Catahoula, Mayo, J.

1Opinion of the CourtYookhies, J.

The object of this suit, on the part of the plaintiff, is to compel the defendant to remove the obstructions which the latter has erected across Bayou Peter.

In the answer, the defendant asks, by way of reconvention, that the plaintiff be compelled to close the ditches by which the latter drains his plantation through this bayou.

The parties own adjoining plantations, through which runs the Bayou Peter. The plaintiff’s estate is situated above, and is' consequently entitled to a natural servitude upon the lower estate of the defendant, for purposes of drainage. The levees or dams erected to…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Froemke v. ParkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Vidrine v. GuilloryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Garmany v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API