Legal Opinion
Edmiston v. City Of Port Angeles
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 21, 2018No. CASE NO. C18-5009 BHSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, United States District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants City of Port Angeles ("City") and Officer Allen Brusseau's ("Officer Brusseau") (collectively "Defendants") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 11). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in *1150support of and in opposition to the motion and the remainder of the file and hereby grants the motion for the reasons stated herein.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 1, 2018, Plaintiff Eric Edmiston, individually and on behalf of his minor son A. E., ("Edmiston") filed a complaint against Defendants. Dkt. 1.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Covington 18 Partners LLC v. Lakeside Industries IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Ellis v. Pierce CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Looper v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Roberts v. LongDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020