Richardson v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Red River. Tried below before the Hon. John 0. Easton.
1Opinion of the Court
Devine, Associate Justice.
The conviction of appellant on a charge of theft from a house is sought to be reversed. The overruling of defendant’s exception to four jurors summoned to supply a deficiency in the regular panel, the errors in the charge as given to the jury, and the refusal to give the instructions asked, and in overruling motion for a new trial, and in arrest of judgment, are assigned as the grounds for a reversal. The absence of four jurors from the regular venire for the week rendered the summoning of others to supply their places necessary. The court therefore did not err in…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Littles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Hall v. Philadelphia Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
- Eichholz v. ShaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Sharp v. JenkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Eichholz v. ShaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.