Legal Opinion

Eichholz v. Shaft

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1926No. 25,036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

By certiorari a decision of the Industrial Commission denying a claim made under the Workmen’s Compensation Act is presented for review.

The facts are these: The claimant and appellant is the widow of Max N. Eichholz, who on November 30, 1923, was drowned in Lake Vermilion while attending to some traps he had set at various points along its shore. He broke through the ice some 20 or 30 feet from shore, near the boundary- line of a 60-acre tract owned by the respondent E. May Shaft, the wife of the other respondent. Mr. Shaft is in the manufacturing business at Faribault, this state, where the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Marsh v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Lennon v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eichholz v. ShaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Anderson v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API