Legal Opinion

Crimi v. Droskoski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 31, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pur*699suant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Stanley Droskoski dated April 10, 1993, which adopted the recommendation of a Hearing Officer, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner is medically able to perform the full-time duties of a police officer without restrictions.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, with costs, the determination is annulled, and the matter is remitted to the respondents for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Although we find that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patricia W. Walston, P. C. v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Mera v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Dennelly v. County Attorney of Nassau CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Boston v. New York State Office for People With Developmental DisabilitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Matter of Bursch v. Purchase Coll. of the State Univ. of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. Town of Boston v. New York State Office for People With Developmental DisabilitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API