Legal Opinion

Guggenheim v. Bielau

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 8, 1937No. 6223PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court affirming the report of a master appointed to distribute, which disallowed the claim of A. S. Guggenheim against General Products Corporation. The facts, which are quite complicated, are fully discussed by the report and in the opinion of the court on a rehearing. Buffalo Colorograph Corp. v. General Products Corp., 19 F. Supp. 443. We avoid needless pres*327ent repetition and limit ourselves to stating that, so far as the facts are concerned, we are in accord with master and court.

We deem it proper to add the appellant complains that certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fell v. PittsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Miller v. DilkesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Buffalo Colorograph Corp. v. General Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joseph v. Krull Wholesale Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API