Legal Opinion
Jackling v. Brighthouse Life Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 28, 2022No. 6:20-cv-06995Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WILLIAM T. JACKLING, Plaintiff, v. DECISION AND ORDER BRIGHTHOUSE LIFE INSURANCE 20-CV-6995-MJP COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Pedersen, M.J. Before the Court is Defendant Brighthouse Life Insurance Company’s motion seeking costs pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1927.1
(Nov. 17, 2021, ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff has not filed any opposition.2 For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Defendant’s motion seeking costs and awards Defendant’s counsel a portion of the requested amount.3 1
28 U.S.C. § 1927
reads: Any attorney or other person admitted to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Millea v. Metro-North RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.