Legal Opinion
Joe Houston v. Marod Supermarkets, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 1, 2013No. 12-15403PublishedCited by 253 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Joe Houston, who is disabled, sued Defendant-Appellee Marod Supermarkets, Inc. (“Marod”) to compel Marod to bring one of its stores, the Presidente Supermarket, into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). The district court determined that Plaintiff Houston lacked standing and dismissed his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After review and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that Plaintiff Houston has standing, vacate the dismissal, and remand for further proceedings.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs Title III…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by253 opinions
- Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Zach Hillesheim v. Holiday Stationstores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- John Nanni v. Aberdeen Marketplace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Patricia Kennedy v. Floridian Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.