Legal Opinion

Stewart v. O'NEILL

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 3, 2002No. CIV.A. 90-2841PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

Now before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Respondent Paul H. O’Neill Should Not Be Found in Civil Contempt [544], defendant’s Opposition thereto, plaintiffs’ reply and plaintiffs’ supplemental reply. Upon consideration of the pleadings, relevant decisions of prior federal courts and the record of this case, the Court hereby DENIES plaintiffs’ Motion for an Order to Show Cause.

I. Background

This history of this case is set forth in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order approving the settlement agreement in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. United States v. Volvo Powertrain CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. Brass Smith, LLC v. Rpi Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  4. Bolger v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. New York v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API