Legal Opinion
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. v. Ruckleshaus
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 1983No. 76 Civ. 2913 (RO)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
This action arises out of a challenge to the constitutionality of certain aspects of the 1978 amendments to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FI-FRA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 136-136y. Specifically, plaintiffs object to the requirement that they disclose their testing data to the public (the “disclosure” provisions) and a second requirement that allows competitors to use such data in support of their own pesticide registrations (the “use” provisions). De fendant is the administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Maine Central Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- SDS Biotech Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.