United States v. Wickersham
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Judge:
In a single assignment of error, the accused argues that the unlawful entry of which he stands convicted is not an offense under military law. Disagreeing, we affirm.
A specification set under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, alleges that the accused did “unlawfully enter a storage area of the United States Air Force.” The record explains that he gained access to this Air Force Civil Engineering Compound storage area by climbing over the chain-link fence which surrounded it.
Upon pleas of guilty to this offense and also to wrongful…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- People v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Ash v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DeitchlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- United States v. WickershamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. ScimecaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982