Legal Opinion

United States v. Wickersham

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 19, 1980No. ACM S24964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Judge:

In a single assignment of error, the accused argues that the unlawful entry of which he stands convicted is not an offense under military law. Disagreeing, we affirm.

A specification set under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, alleges that the accused did “unlawfully enter a storage area of the United States Air Force.” The record explains that he gained access to this Air Force Civil Engineering Compound storage area by climbing over the chain-link fence which surrounded it.

Upon pleas of guilty to this offense and also to wrongful…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. People v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Ash v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DeitchlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. United States v. WickershamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. ScimecaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API