Western Surety Co. v. Gates
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I concur. I cannot agree, however, that the evidence shows that the injunction was wrongfully issued for the reasons stated in the majority opinion. Nevertheless, I conclude that it was. The record seems to me to be silent on that point, except that it is clear that the dissolution of the injunction was based upon the dismissal for want of prosecution of Texas Continental Oil Company’s original action for injunction. It further appears that there was a proper basis for this action.
Our pertinent statutes relating to injunction bonds are Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 32-206, 32-207 (Repl. 1962), which are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dowling v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Loomis v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Pugh's adm'r v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
- Blakeney v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857