Legal Opinion

United States v. Razmilovic

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 17, 2007No. 06-4195-cr(L), 06-4198-cr(CON)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATZMANN, Circuit Judge:

The decision by a district court to declare a mistrial is of great consequence.

The case at hand calls on us to review such a ruling, to determine whether it was an abuse of discretion for a trial court to decide that a single jury note indicating deadlock created a “manifest necessity” to declare a mistrial. On the record before us, we conclude that it was. We therefore hold that retrial of defendants-appellants Michael DeGennaro (“DeGennaro”) and Frank Borghese (“Borghese”) would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We also must decide whether…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hoffler v. BezioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Marte v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Najawicz v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  4. United States v. Lara-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. Harrison v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API