United States v. Razmilovic
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge:
The decision by a district court to declare a mistrial is of great consequence.
The case at hand calls on us to review such a ruling, to determine whether it was an abuse of discretion for a trial court to decide that a single jury note indicating deadlock created a “manifest necessity” to declare a mistrial. On the record before us, we conclude that it was. We therefore hold that retrial of defendants-appellants Michael DeGennaro (“DeGennaro”) and Frank Borghese (“Borghese”) would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We also must decide whether…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hoffler v. BezioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Marte v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Najawicz v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- United States v. Lara-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Harrison v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.