Legal Opinion

United States v. Lara-Ramirez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 11, 2008No. 06-2108PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Paulino Lara-Ramirez (“Lara”) appeals the denial of a motion to dismiss the charges against him on double jeopardy grounds after his first trial resulted in a mistrial. He argues that the district court’s mistrial declaration, following discovery of a Bible in the jury room during deliberations, was made without his consent and without the required showing of manifest necessity. After careful review, we agree and conclude that the district court erred in refusing to dismiss the indictment.

I

Lara was indicted for importing and distributing more than 500 grams of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. VanvlietCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. Bebo v. MedeirosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  5. Oliver v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API