Legal Opinion
Silo v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 23, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
Before the court are the Department of Aging’s preliminary objections to Jerome Silo’s petition for review in the nature of mandamus filed in this court’s original jurisdiction in which he alleges that he requested and was refused Long-Term Care Ombudsman Services and that the Department of Aging is, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 1 for refusing said services. 2
The State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program was created pursuant to Section 2203-A(a)(24.2) of The Administrative Code 3 and Section 712 of the Older Americans Act, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Werner v. ZazycznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Africa v. HornCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Williams v. WorleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tindell v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Rosario v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- A.D. Brown v. PA Dept. of Ed.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- G. Pittman v. Com. of PA., PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Wholaver, E., Jr. v. Com. of PASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018