Legal Opinion

Anustasakas v. International Contract Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1908No. 7618PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered May 7, 1908, granting a new trial, after a nonsuit in an action for wrongful death.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

— This action was instituted by the widow and minor children of G. K. Anustasakas, deceased, to recover damages for his death caused, as is alleged, by the neglect of the defendant. At the close of the plaintiffs’ testimony the court granted a nonsuit, but afterwards set aside the nonsuit and granted a new trial. From the latter order this appeal is taken.

There is nothing in the record to indicate the particular grounds upon which either motion was granted, but in support of the nonsuit the appellant contends: (1) That the guardian ad litem for the minor respondents was not properly…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Augusta Railway Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Mexican National Railway Co. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Mulhall v. FallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Brock v. MilliganOhio Supreme Court · 1840

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burgess v. GilchristWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Garvin v. Western Cooperage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Anustasakas v. International Contract Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Koloff v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. VickstromCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API