United States v. Pedro Lopez-Flores
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The defendant’s lawyer has filed a motion to withdraw supported by an Anders brief; we can grant the motion if but only if there are no nonfrivolous grounds for appeal, that is, if the appeal is “groundless in light of legal principles and decisions.” United States v. Eggen, 984 F.2d 848, 850 (7th Cir.1993). All but one of the grounds discussed, and rightly asserted to be frivolous, in the Anders brief are discussed in our unpublished order issued today; this published opinion is confined to the one ground on which there is no circuit or Supreme Court precedent. But as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Dale R. EggenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Javier Dario GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Antonio Reyes-Pacheco, AKA Antonio Reyes PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Castrillon-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Juan Jose Reyes-NavaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Ruiz-GeaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Cano-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. EasterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Christine Annemarie Lennon, Christine A. LennonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.