Cox v. O'Riley
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Yanderburgh Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Assumpsit by the plaintiffs against the defendants for the purpose of recovering from the latter the value of a box of goods which it is alleged they received as wharfingers, and negligently lost. Plea, non assumpsit. Trial by the Court without a jury, and judgment for the defendants. A motion for a new trial was overruled.
The evidence is upon the record; and from it, it appears that in March, 1851, the plaintiffs, Cox, Robb, Sf Co., purchased of a mercantile house in Cincinnati, Ohio, a bill of goods exceeding 800 dollars in amount, which goods were to be forwarded to the store of said Cox,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Holt Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Arthur Jordan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Scott v. HartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Rastetter v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Spears v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Traders' Insurance v. DobbinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.