Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chamberlin Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1943No. Appeal, 291PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

Testatrix bequeathed her estate to five named sons. The share of one of them was placed in trust. She named a son as executor. The executor caused the estate to be appraised for transfer inheritance tax. The tax was assessed and paid. At the audit of the account two claims were presented concerning the maintenance of the son whose share had been placed in trust. One of the claims was by the County Institution District, and the other by the Commonwealth, through the Department of Revenue, Bureau of Institution Collections. Both claims were allowed. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Tamaqua Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reynolds EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Darsie EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Haid EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Carver EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. McCandless EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API