Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Santiago

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

Appellant, Vincent Santiago, entered pleas of guilty to charges of robbery, aggravated assault, and conspiracy. Appellant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of seven and one-half to sixteen years. 1 On appeal to the Superior Court from the judgment of sentence, appellant alleged that his guilty plea to the charge of robbery was not knowingly and intelligently entered because counsel was ineffective in failing to inform appellant that intoxication could negate an element of the robbery offense. The Superior Court remanded to allow appellant an opportunity to file a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. GravesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. RumseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Scarpone v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API