Commonwealth v. Roberts
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
This appeal concerns the validity of appellant’s guilty pleas to four separate indictments. Appellant contends that his guilty pleas were not voluntarily and understandingly entered because the colloquies conducted prior to the court’s acceptance of his pleas were inadequate in that they failed to advise him of various rights. See Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198 (1974); Pa. R. Crim. P. Rule 319 (a)¡ and comments thereto. We need not address appellant’s contention at this time because appellant is not properly before this court.
Appellant has made the common, and up to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. IngramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ZakrzewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LincolnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. Monjaras-AmayaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Dixon, J. v. Northwestern MutualSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. StraderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.