Kettner v. Snow
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
Plaintiffs (defendants below) seek to pro-. hibit the district court from further proceeding after it had granted a new trial based upon a motion not timely filed. 1
The defendants Watkins (plaintiffs below) commenced the original action to recover for personal injuries and property damages resulting from an automobile collision. A jury returned a verdict of no cause of action and judgment was entered thereon November 30, 1961. Our rule on new trials, 59(b), provides that “A motion for a new trial shall be served not later than 10 days after the entry of judgment.” Defendants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atwood v. Cox, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Broadbent v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- National Life Ins. Co. v. KohnOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Uptown Appliance & Radio Co., Inc. v. FLINTUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Frost v. District Court of First Judicial District Ex Rel. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Cook v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Utah State Building Board v. Walsh Plumbing CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. BundyUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Preece v. PreeceUtah Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.