In re HSBC Telephone Conversation Recording Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
Sarah S. Vance, Chair,
Before the Panel: Plaintiffs in three Central District of California actions move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to -centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Central District of California. The litigation consists of four actions, listed on Schedule A, that challenge the propriety of HSBC’s alleged recording of certain calls with customers who had defaulted on their credit card accounts. Plaintiffs in the Southern District of California action (Me-deiros ), along with the HSBC 1 and Capital One2 defendants oppose centralization.
On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In Re Directbuy, Inc., Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010