Legal Opinion

In Re Directbuy, Inc., Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 5, 2010No. MDL 2132PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiff in an action in the Southern District of Indiana has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of Indiana. This litigation currently consists of four actions pending as follows: an action each in the Central District of California, the District of Connecticut, the Southern District of Indiana, and the Eastern District of New York, as listed on Schedule A.

Plaintiffs in the Central District of California action support the motion in its entirety. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  2. In Re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Nutella Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  2. In re HSBC Telephone Conversation Recording LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
  3. In re Tween Brands, Inc., Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API