United States v. Portland Cement Company of Utah
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
We have again the problem of how to determine, for the purpose of fixing the depletion allowance granted by federal income tax statutes, the income from the mining of a unique mineral for which no market exists and which is first salable commercially as a finished product, cement. In the absence of sales of the mineral the gross income from mining must be determined constructively. The question is how to do this. The trial court adopted the substitute-materials method of the taxpayer and rejected the proportionate-profits method of the government. We must decide…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Kirby Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Standard Lime and Cement Company (Formerly Known as the Standard Lime and Stone Company) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. California Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Portland Cement Company of Utah, a Utah Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Claycraft CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
- Portland Cement Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.