Legal Opinion
William Krieger v. Bank of America NA
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 16, 2018No. 17-1275PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAUSE, Circuit Judge.
The same day Appellant William Krieger fell victim to a credit card scam and discovered a fraudulent $657 charge on his bill, he protested to his card issuer, Bank of America (BANA), 1 and was told both that the charge would be removed and that, pending "additional information," BANA considered the matter resolved. And indeed, Krieger's next bill reflected a $657 credit. But over a month later Krieger opened his mail to some particularly unwelcome additional information: BANA was rebilling him for the charge. He disputed it again, this time in writing, but after BANA…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Alan Schmidt v. John SkolasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- City of Cambridge Retirement v. Altisource Asset Management CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Jamila Russell v. Superior Court of the Virgin ICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Garry Curtis v. Propel Property Tax FundingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Stuart Weichsel v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.