DeNike v. Mowery
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
This appeal precipitates a confrontation between two apparently applicable principles of tort law, and necessitates either an accommodation of the two rules or a choice of one or the other. The first principle — and the one which ultimately prevails by virtue of the decision herein — is fundamental in the sense that it relates to the function of the law of torts. It is somewhat difficult to articulate, but may be stated in the following manner:
Arising out of the various and ever-increasing clashes of the activities of persons living in a common society, carrying on business in competition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Derby v. PrewittNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Martin v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Tidwell v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Sams v. CurfmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- McMillen v. KlingensmithTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Callan v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Pepper v. J.J. Welcome Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- In Re the Marriage of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.