Legal Opinion

DeNike v. Mowery

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1966No. 37751PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This appeal precipitates a confrontation between two apparently applicable principles of tort law, and necessitates either an accommodation of the two rules or a choice of one or the other. The first principle — and the one which ultimately prevails by virtue of the decision herein — is fundamental in the sense that it relates to the function of the law of torts. It is somewhat difficult to articulate, but may be stated in the following manner:

Arising out of the various and ever-increasing clashes of the activities of persons living in a common society, carrying on business in competition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Derby v. PrewittNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Martin v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tidwell v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Sams v. CurfmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McMillen v. KlingensmithTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Callan v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Pepper v. J.J. Welcome Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. In Re the Marriage of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API