In re N.C.H.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
STROUD, Judge dissenting.
Because I do not believe the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction to enter the orders terminating parental rights as to the three juveniles, I respectfully dissent.
I. Background
The majority opinion correctly states the procedural history of this case. However, the failure of this Court in some of its prior opinions to identify clearly and to state in the opinion the factual details regarding the summonses which were actually issued has caused some of the confusion in the cases. Therefore, I would like to note that in this case, termination of parental rights…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Harris v. PembaurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- In re K.A.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In re J.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.