Ployhar v. Board of Trustees of Missoula County High School
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Harrison
I must respectfully dissent to the majority’s opinion in this matter. I find that the trial court properly admitted the testimony of Simms as an expert, and for that reason should have sustained the verdict of the jury in the matter.
Under the Montana Rules of Evidence, recently adopted, said rules call for the liberal use of expert testimony. As noted in the opinion, the rule involved here is Rule 702, which states:
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pickett v. KygerMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- Bratt v. Western Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Burns Miley, Jr. v. Delta Marine Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Raymond Tank and Elizabeth Tank v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Nesbitt v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.