Walsh Ex Rel. Estate of Walsh v. Chez
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLOCH, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ “12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).” For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that it can exercise specific jurisdiction over Defendants, that venue is proper in this district, and that transfer of this case is therefore unwarranted. Accordingly, the Court will deny Defendants’ Motion.
I. Background
Plaintiff Laura Walsh and Plaintiff Daniel Walsh (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint in the present case on behalf of themselves and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mendel v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Jones v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Carter v. Wake ForestSupreme Court of Virginia · 2024
- Savu v. Purolite CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Williams, J. v. OAO Severstal v. Tri-State SafetySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019