Legal Opinion
Gambrel v. Duensing
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1932No. Docket No. 4641PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff had judgment in this action against the defendant for the sum of $15,000, for and on account of personal injuries alleged to have been received in an automobile accident which occurred on the eighth day of January, 1931, and further alleged as having resulted from the negligence of the defendant. From the judgment entered after the denial of the motion for a new trial, the defendant appeals.
The record shows that on the eighth day of January, 1931, the plaintiff in this action, accompanied by her son, Louis Gambrel, was driving in a southerly direction on the state highway…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Uhl v. FertigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Marston v. Pickwick Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by14 opinions
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Matthews v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Backus v. SessionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Pacific Greyhound Lines v. ZaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.