Legal Opinion
State v. Cooper
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 1997No. 96APC09-1154PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lazarus, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from entries of the Franklin County Municipal Court excluding from evidence the results of a breath test administered to defendant-appellee, Craig S. Cooper, and dismissing the OMVI per se charge against him. The state asserts one assignment of error:
“The trial court erred in finding that the approval of the relevant calibration solution was so flawed that it was ineffective to demonstrate substantial compliance with Ohio Administrative Code 3701-53-04.”
Because the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the results of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PeprahFranklin County Municipal Court · 2006
- State v. ScurtiOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Akron v. Tomko, Unpublished Decision (11-3-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. Dye, Unpublished Decision (4-28-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. PrichardOhio Court of Appeals · 2026