Legal Opinion

The M. E. Luckenbach

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 22, 1912PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by William R. Printz, master of the barge William H. Conner, and H. N. Hartwell & Son, Incorporated, owner of her cargo, against the steam lug M. E. Luckenbach (Edgar E. Luck-enbach, estate of Lewis Luckenbach, and estate of Edward Luck-enbach, claimants) and the schooner Hugh Kelly, impleaded (Elisha H. Weaver, claimant).

1Opinion of the Court

VEEDER, District Judge.

This action arises out of a collision between the barge A. G. Ropes, in tow of the steam tug M. E. Lucken-bach, and the schooner Hugh Kelly, at or near the junction of Main Ship and Swash Channels, shortly after noon on April 22, 1909.

The tug Luckenbach was outward bound in the Main Ship Channel, with the loaded coal barges A. G. Ropes, William II. Conner, and Henry Endicott in tow, in the order named, on hawsers 75 fathoms or more in length. The three-masted schooner Hugh Kelly, outward bound, without cargo, was proceeding down the Swash Channel. The tug and schooner…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Porello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Southgate v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. In Re Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. The SunnysideCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  5. The WestchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API